Super Bowl Logos, Ranked - Part 1

To kick things off, we ranked all the existing logos because why not. We mention different eras, which we’ve loosely defined as Vintage (I-XVIII), Classic (XIX-XXVII), Modern (XXVIII-XXXIX), Postmodern (XL-XLIV), and the Dark Ages (XLV-LIV) based on prominent demarcations in design philosophy and messaging.

Note: The logos for SBs I-IV were revised after the fact, so we’ve covered the logos that the league defines as official on its website.


wikipedia.org

wikipedia.org

57. Super Bowl LIV

After adopting the template system, the league didn’t even commit to sticking to it. Why did they change the font? Maybe it’s nicer than the last three, but not having the courage to stick to weak convictions is… well… weak.


nfl.com

nfl.com

56.–54. Super Bowls LI–LIII

Using the font that was developed for the league (which may actually be called “NFL”) is solid brand consistency, but it’s also staid and boring. At least there’s some color in these? What’s really confusing is the decision to place “Super Bowl” beneath the numerals. There’s plenty of brand recognition here, but to consciously go with, effectively, “51 Super Bowl” and to iterate on it? Odd.


nfl.com

nfl.com

53. Super Bowl 50

To us, yes, it’s a difficult design challenge to use just an L, but this edges on garish. Embellishing all that silver with gold… gross. Couple that with the shrug emoji of a cop out of “50” and here we are.

Wikipedia.org

wikipedia.org

52. Super Bowl LV

You know what? The numerals here are kinda pleasing to look at. They compel us to ask why the font change (again) and the texture, but then we wonder why it features Dolphins colors when the game is in Tampa and lose our nerve. Then again, none of the previous four logos used colors indicative of the host team either because NOTHING MATTERS ANYMORE. (Yes, SB LIV was in Miami and the logo used vaguely Dolphins colors, but the league gets no such benefit of the doubt at this point.)

“But wait,” you say. “Is the trophy supposed to be an I? Is it Super Bowl LIV? Wasn’t last year Super Bowl LIV?”

“[loud sigh]”

nfl.com

nfl.com

51.–47. Super Bowls XLV–XLIX

The reason we’re here in the first place. Yes, they’re technically silver, but they’re really just grey. Rendering the different stadiums helps distinguish them, but only from each other. Technically very well constructed, but creatively lifeless.


wikipedia.org

46. Super Bowl LVI

WE DID IT EVERYONE! All of us out here doing our own logos made the league look so bad that they… gave exactly one single shit more about this logo than the last 11.

They’re trying here. That deserves some credit, but not much. The horizontal bar of the L is the same length as the stem, which isn’t necessarily a typographical sin, but it is pretty awkward. At least the logo clues us in to where the game is being played: Hawaii.

45. Super Bowl LVII

Hey now! There’s some cool stuff going on here. Riffing on the state flag, applying that interestingly over the canyon, moving the trophy so the space between the L and V isn’t as awkward. Unfortunately, those open up some color and contrast issues. Still… progress!

nfl.com

nfl.com

44. Super Bowl XVIII

The nadir of the pale blue/red color scheme that straddles the Vintage and Classic eras. The contrast is rough and reminds us of old mimeograph paper in school (we’re old!) and the ribbon should to behind the last roman numeral on the right. The font looks like it was lifted from Rocky and Bullwinkle (we’re so old!).


nfl.com

nfl.com

43. Super Bowl I

Not a logo, really. Interesting typography, but could we fill in the “AFL” and “NFL?”


nfl.com

nfl.com

42. Super Bowl XXII

Much like SB XXIII, seems like it’s halfway finished, and the red-on-blue contrast problems that run through the Classic era are here, too. Considering so many sizes is a modern thing, but the thin white outlines around the numerals create too much tension instead of contrast.


nfl.com

nfl.com

41. Super Bowl XI

This would be higher on the list if the typography treatment hadn’t been on the fourth iteration of this single-line layout. Drop caps are cool though.

nfl.com

nfl.com

40. Super Bowl XLIV

Maybe it’s because this is the last of the unique logos, but this feels like the league was just running on fumes. The Postmodern era featured field elements more and more prominently, but why? It was a little awkward.


nfl.com

nfl.com

39. Super Bowl VII

Another single-line layout in the Vintage era. While this doesn’t use the same font/numeral scheme, it does dilute the fantastic take from SB V significantly. Also, that color contrast. Yeesh.

nfl.com

nfl.com

38. Super Bowl XV

The typography is flat, and the colors are as bland as the overall concept. By this time, there had been some genuinely creative versions, so this must have been a letdown.


nfl.com

nfl.com

37. Super Bowl XVI

Solid typography, but low on concept again. We don’t love the slab serifs, but it’s a step up from the previous game.


nfl.com

nfl.com

36. Super Bowl VI

We know it’s far more of the time, but the gilded typography is… woof. Sure, the gold goes along with the theme and location, but we don’t have to like it.

nfl.com

nfl.com

35. Super Bowl XLII

From the postmodern era suite that used the on-field elements, but what is the element? An abstracted field? Nice layout and movement, but the color scheme is a little harsh.

[Note: Readers have let us know that the mystery element is the shape of Arizona, where the game was held. We really shoulda known that. Thank you, readers!]


nfl.com

nfl.com

34. Super Bowl VIII

Coming toward the end of that single-line layout, which will necessitate a change. The color scheme is very stark, but points again for the drop-capped “S” and numerals.

nfl.com

nfl.com

33. Super Bowl XXIX

This is a very dated color scheme, even for 1994. Visually, it’s more evocative of Arizona (or Tostitos) than Miami. The offset strokes add more tension than depth and there’s a lot of confusing choices made with their relationship to each other and the whole composition.


nfl.com

nfl.com

32. Super Bowl IV

Granted it’s only the fourth iteration, but the two actual logos before it were far stronger.


nfl.com

nfl.com

31. Super Bowl XXVI

Again with the red-on-pale-blue color scheme. Nice treatment on the football, but between the razor-thin numeral outline and the ridges, we can’t get on board.


nfl.com

nfl.com

30. Super Bowl XXIII

There’s a nice repetition and alignment with the diagonals, but the overall layout feels unfinished again. The typography does deserve a few points, though.


nfl.com

nfl.com

29. Super Bowl XVII

Leans into an Art Deco vibe nicely. The pale blue with red scheme is used much more effectively here, and the wings are a nice touch. The point of the V needs to be either shorter or longer than it is.


nfl.com

nfl.com

28. Super Bowl XIX

There’s a nice Deco slant here too, and the white-on-blue treatment would have been worked better though the Classic era. Nice use of the grey to create depth.